<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: War of the Ring: A Two-Player Game With Strategy to Spare</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scienceofboardgames.com/2010/02/war-of-the-ring-a-two-player-game-with-strategy-to-spare/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scienceofboardgames.com/2010/02/war-of-the-ring-a-two-player-game-with-strategy-to-spare/</link>
	<description>Rants and raves about board games, cards, randomness, and stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 21:23:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: First Impressions: Betrayal at House on the Hill &#124; Science of Board Games</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceofboardgames.com/2010/02/war-of-the-ring-a-two-player-game-with-strategy-to-spare/comment-page-1/#comment-755</link>
		<dc:creator>First Impressions: Betrayal at House on the Hill &#124; Science of Board Games</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 23:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceofboardgames.com/?p=248#comment-755</guid>
		<description>[...]    War of the Ring: A Two-Player Game With Strategy to Spare [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]    War of the Ring: A Two-Player Game With Strategy to Spare [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evgeny</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceofboardgames.com/2010/02/war-of-the-ring-a-two-player-game-with-strategy-to-spare/comment-page-1/#comment-683</link>
		<dc:creator>Evgeny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 20:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceofboardgames.com/?p=248#comment-683</guid>
		<description>&quot;War of the Ring is not a Fantasy Flight original, so seems to have much fewer problems with these issues than many of their other games.&quot;

Umm... Have we read the same 30-page FAQ/erratum/card clarification file?
Don&#039;t get me wrong, War of the Ring is one of my top five, but it has the dubious honor of having an FAQ that&#039;s longer that the rulebook. The rules are also very easy to get wrong.

Best advise is to get an experienced player to teach you the game - much lower chances of atrocious gameplay errors :)

Other than that, it&#039;s a magnificent game, rich in strategy and dripping with theme. Have a blast playing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;War of the Ring is not a Fantasy Flight original, so seems to have much fewer problems with these issues than many of their other games.&#8221;</p>
<p>Umm&#8230; Have we read the same 30-page FAQ/erratum/card clarification file?<br />
Don&#8217;t get me wrong, War of the Ring is one of my top five, but it has the dubious honor of having an FAQ that&#8217;s longer that the rulebook. The rules are also very easy to get wrong.</p>
<p>Best advise is to get an experienced player to teach you the game &#8211; much lower chances of atrocious gameplay errors <img src='http://www.scienceofboardgames.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Other than that, it&#8217;s a magnificent game, rich in strategy and dripping with theme. Have a blast playing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

